Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Mar 2016Decisions, Decisions, Decisions Armando J. Lorenzo and Luis H.P. Braga Armando J. LorenzoArmando J. Lorenzo More articles by this author and Luis H.P. BragaLuis H.P. Braga More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.055AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Parental decisional regret after primary distal hypospadias repair: family and surgery variables, and repair outcomes. J Urol2016; 195: 720. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Decisional regret after distal hypospadias repair: single institution prospective analysis of factors associated with subsequent parental remorse or distress. J Urol2014; 191: 1558. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Do adult men with untreated hypospadias have adverse outcomes? A pilot study using a social media advertised survey. J Pediatr Urol2014; 10: 672. Google Scholar 4 : Evidence regarding cosmetic and medically unnecessary surgery on infants. J Pediatr Urol2014; 10: 2. Google Scholar 5 : Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol2013; 9: 151. Google Scholar 6 : Online hypospadias support group data analysis. J Pediatr Surg2011; 46: 520. Google Scholar 7 : Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res2002; 14: 283. Google Scholar 8 : What is a good looking penis? How women rate the penile appearance of men with surgically corrected hypospadias. J Sex Med2015; 12: 1737. Google Scholar 9 : Analysis of decisional conflict among parents who consent to hypospadias repair: single institution prospective study of 100 couples. J Urol2012; 188: 571. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Promoting shared decision making in disorders of sex development (DSD): decision aids and support tools. Horm Metab Res2015; 47: 335. Google Scholar © 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 3March 2016Page: 551-553 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Armando J. Lorenzo More articles by this author Luis H.P. Braga More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.101 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.228 | 0.079 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".