Review Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis - a physicochemical
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian physiologist PA Stewart advanced the theory that the proton concentration, and hence pH, in any compartment is dependent on the charges of fully ionized and partly ionized species, and on the prevailing CO2 tension, all of which he dubbed independent variables. Because the kidneys regulate the concentrations of the most important fully ionized species ([K + ], [Na + ], and [Cl – ]) but neither CO2 nor weak acids, the implication is that it should be possible to ascertain the renal contribution to acid–base homeostasis based on the excretion of these ions. One further corollary of Stewart’s theory is that, because pH is solely dependent on the named independent variables, transport of protons to and from a compartment by itself will not influence pH. This is apparently in great contrast to models of proton pumps and bicarbonate transporters currently being examined in great molecular detail. Failure of these pumps and cotransporters is at the root of disorders called renal tubular acidoses. The unquestionable relation between malfunction of proton transporters and renal tubular acidosis represents a problem for Stewart theory. This review shows that the dilemma for Stewart theory is only apparent because transport of acid–base equivalents is accompanied by electrolytes. We suggest that Stewart theory may lead to new questions that must be investigated experimentally. Also, recent evidence from physiology that pH may not regulate acid–base transport is in accordance with the concepts presented by Stewart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".