MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2252370166

Windows and doors: world market outlook

2013· preprint· en· W2252370166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Colautti, Stefania Pelizzari, Michela Amico

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2013
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoorsConsumption (sociology)International tradeChinaEconomyBusinessGeographyEngineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CSIL Market Research Windows and Doors: world market outlook, contains current and historical data (production, consumption, imports, exports) and analysis of Window and Door industry for a total of 70 countries. It focuses on the 30 most important Windows and Doors markets: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom and the United States. Data on international trade of windows and doors cover (in addition to the 30 countries listed above), 40 other countries, for a total of 70 countries. Part I deals with production, consumption and international trade of Windows and Doors and includes a section on world Windows and Doors statistics and an appendix with methodology notes; Part II consists of 30 country analysis tables, which include: Windows and Doors industry trends of production, apparent consumption, exports, imports for the years 2003-2012 and forecasts of yearly changes in Windows and Doors consumption in 2013 and 2014 - Major trading partners (countries of origin of imports and destination of exports of Windows and Doors)- nformation on breakdown of production by material (wood, metal, plastics) for a selection of countries; Part III includes Short profiles of major Windows and Doors manufacturers associations worldwide and a list of major sector fairs; Part IV contains addresses of top Windows and Doors manufacturers worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.019
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207