Total meat production and its tendencies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyses the state of total world meat production, by continents and by countries. It is established that the total world meat production is constantly increasing. It amounted to 236.541.000 in 2001 and 265.106.000 tonnes in 2005. Tendency of annual increase from 2001 to 2005 was 5.454.000 tonnes. Since 2005 the highest total meat production (by continent) was in Asia (111.835.000 tonnes), followed by Europe (52.912.000 tonnes), North and Central America (51.321.000 tonnes), South America (31.088.000 tonnes), Africa (12.110.000 tonnes) and Oceania (5.841.000 tonnes). Tendency of total meat production from 2001 to 2005 on all continents was positive. It is the highest in Asia, followed by Europe, South America, North and Central America, Africa and Oceania. The leading meat producers in 2005 were: China (77.564.000 tonnes), The USA (39.556.000 tonnes), Brazil (19.919.000 tonnes), Germany (6.884.000 tonnes), India (6.297.000 tonnes), France (6.179.000 tonnes), Spain (5.736.000 tonnes), Mexico (5.040.000 tonnes),The Russian Federation (4.885.000 tonnes), Canada (4.680.000 tonnes), Argentina (4.175.000 tonnes), Italy (4.099.000 tonnes) and Australia (3.946.000 tonnes). Positive tendencies in total meat production (2001-2005) were found in: Austria, Belgium-Luxemburg, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Great Britain, Denmark, Germany, Poland, The Russian Federation, Slovenia, Croatia, Spain, Japan, China, India, South Africa, Canada, The USA, Mexico, Brazil and Australia. Negative tendencies in total meat production (2001-2005) were recorded in: Italy, Macedonia, Romania, Hungary, Ukraine, France, The Netherlands, Czech Republic and Argentina. .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it