Is chronic poisoning with acetaminophen in children a frequent occurrence in Toronto?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen is a common cause of poisoning in children. Recent American studies suggest that acetaminophen poisonings pose serious risks in children, particularly in the case of chronic poisoning caused by therapeutic error. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether chronic acetaminophen poisoning in children is a frequent occurrence in a large, Canadian, urban population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study. Charts of all patients admitted to The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario from January 1, 1990 to June 31, 1996 with an acetaminophen overdose were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were admitted within the study period; only four of whom were preschool children (younger than five years of age). Among the preschool children, three had an acute overdose and one had possible chronic poisoning by therapeutic error. All preschool children were treated with N-acetylcysteine; one developed hepatotoxicity (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase greater than 1000 U/L) after presenting 24 h after acute ingestion. Of the remaining patients, all were adolescents; 102 had acute intentional overdose and four had staggered intentional overdoses. Fifty-three adolescents were treated with N-acetyl cysteine. Hepatotoxicity was present in 13 of 63 adolescents (21%). No patients required liver transplantation or died. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to American experience, chronic acetaminophen poisoning, including therapeutic error in children in Toronto, is a rare occurrence--most cases of acetaminophen poisonings are acute intentional ingestion in adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".