Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are many restrictions in the use of high strength HSSs including yield strength and yield ratio in 600MPa steel. There are some recommendations that the yield strength and the yield ratio of HSSmembers need to be 360MPa and 80%, respectively in AISC and Canadian Codes. It is essential to understand the true buckling behaviors of HSSs using high strength steel at these limit states. Even though there aremany experimental data in the rectangular HSSs, but the circular ones are not enough for the high strength steel. The primary purpose of this paper is to understand the serviceability and failure mechanisms of 600MPa and 400MPa steels under the evaluation of the connection equations in terms of limit states based on the test results. The experimental works were performed with the variations of the slenderness ratio in the compression web members and eccentricity. As a result, the compression web member reaches the elastic buckling at the compressionmembers in high strength steel members and the inelastic buckling behaviors occurred in the low strength members. The maximumloading was not varied by the eccentricity, nevertheless the stress concentration was identified if the eccentricity was increased by the excess of the certain limitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".