Bibliographic record
Abstract
National Report to the ICA 16th General Assembly Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2015 Croatia has been a member of the International Cartographic Association – ICA since 1995 and one of its obligations has been to submit national reports about its cartographic activities to general assemblies held every four years. The bearer of these activities in Croatia is the Croatian Cartographic Society. Croatia became a member of the ICA in Barcelona in 1995, where its first national report for the period 1991– 1995 was submitted. Reports were also submitted in Ottawa in 1999 for the period 1995–1999, in Durban (Republic of South Africa) in 2003 for the period 1999–2003, in Moscow in 2007 for the period 2003–2007, and in Paris in 2011 for the period 2007–2011. This report, which covers the period 2011–2015, will be submitted at the General Assembly of the ICA in Rio de Janeiro in 2015. As a result of this work, Croatia has a comprehensive overview of cartographic activities in the past 20 years, i.e. since it became an independent state. The report is divided into the following sections: Official Cartography, Academic Cartography, Commercial Cartography and Other Activities. The report ends with Acknowledgments and a Bibliography. A report such as this will never include all the activities of the preceding period. This is because not all parties responded to the invitation to collaborate. Nevertheless, the most relevant institutions and companies are represented in the report. It is the result of individual contributions, and those people are listed in the Acknowledgments. The list of references at the end of the report was based on data provided by collaborators on the report, searching the Croatian Scientific Bibliography database, and other sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".