Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since James Barrie`s Peter Pan(1911) appeared, its hero, Peter Pan has been an object of love and desire to the people around the world. For children, Peter is a child never grows up; but rather, remains innocent, with a pure heart and always plays. For adults, he evokes childhood anxiety. However, Peter is an ambivalent character. He has not only a youthful and innocent image, but also a child/ he has adult qualities who seeks for power, despotism and control. Leaving home, he wants to be an eternal child. And he lives in the Neverland as a child, where he is portrayed as a boy/adult. Far from being innocent and peaceful, ironically the place is full of brutality, unmerciful retribution to enemies and despotic rules. After several years Peter returns home. But his mother has already forgotten him. His parents installed iron bars in his nursery so he is not able to return to his mother. Leaving home crying, Peter never returns home and to his mother. And he has an ambivalent emotion to his mother-longing for mothering and rejection of mothering. As a result of that Peter becomes a boy, who cannot recognize women`s emotion and love. Consequently, the figure of Peter Pan is the particular product of Barrie`s disturbed childhood. In the life time Barrie had been longing for the mother`s love. But his mother could not really see Barrie. Her eyes were befogged with the image of dead son David. Barrie`s feeling rejected from mother is represented in Peter Pan. Neverland is the place where the inner world of Barrie`s unsatisfied, repressed childhood is reproduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".