MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253019640

『피터 팬』에 나타난 네버랜드의 공간적 위상

2007· article· ko· W2253019640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이수경

Bibliographic record

Venue동화와 번역 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbivalenceFeelingPsychoanalysisPsychologySocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since James Barrie`s Peter Pan(1911) appeared, its hero, Peter Pan has been an object of love and desire to the people around the world. For children, Peter is a child never grows up; but rather, remains innocent, with a pure heart and always plays. For adults, he evokes childhood anxiety. However, Peter is an ambivalent character. He has not only a youthful and innocent image, but also a child/ he has adult qualities who seeks for power, despotism and control. Leaving home, he wants to be an eternal child. And he lives in the Neverland as a child, where he is portrayed as a boy/adult. Far from being innocent and peaceful, ironically the place is full of brutality, unmerciful retribution to enemies and despotic rules. After several years Peter returns home. But his mother has already forgotten him. His parents installed iron bars in his nursery so he is not able to return to his mother. Leaving home crying, Peter never returns home and to his mother. And he has an ambivalent emotion to his mother-longing for mothering and rejection of mothering. As a result of that Peter becomes a boy, who cannot recognize women`s emotion and love. Consequently, the figure of Peter Pan is the particular product of Barrie`s disturbed childhood. In the life time Barrie had been longing for the mother`s love. But his mother could not really see Barrie. Her eyes were befogged with the image of dead son David. Barrie`s feeling rejected from mother is represented in Peter Pan. Neverland is the place where the inner world of Barrie`s unsatisfied, repressed childhood is reproduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue동화와 번역Same topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207