MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253404228

La nature du droit d'auteur: droit de propriété ou monopole? (The Nature of Copyright: Property Right or Monopoly?)

2013· article· fr· W2253404228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntellectual Property Law
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceIntellectual propertyPhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour un avocat specialise en propriete intellectuelle, c’est une tâche laborieuse que de suivre l’ineluctable evolution de la technologie. C’est ainsi que nous en venons a passer outre les plus fondamentales des lignes directrices : les lecons du passe. Les regles de base du droit d’auteur sont inspirees de ce que nous appelons la prpriete ordinaire, ayant ses origines dans les droits romain et civil. Avec une comprehension complete de ces sources directes, nous pouvons anticiper de futurs developpements des droits d’Auteurs. La loi canadienne sur le droit d’auteur a herite du systeme anglais – et consequemment americain – de copyright et du systeme francais de droit d’auteur. Le premier a eu une grande influence sur l’interpretation du droit canadien. La question largement debattue au cours de la derniere decennie est celle de la reconceptualisation des droits d’auteurs, a partir des droits subjectifs et generalement coercitifs, de maniere a permettre l’expansion de l’autoroute de l’information. L’histoire nous dira que les choses ne changent pas radicalement et que le modele de propriete ordinaire demeure l’exemple par excellence d’une construction logique. Cet article met l’accent sur les premieres metamorphoses du droit de propriete qui ont graduellement ouvert la voie a l’inclusion des choses intangibles dans ce concept.For an intellectual property lawyer it is a laborious task to conscientiously follow the inevitable evolution of technology. However in doing so, lawyers are bypassing the most fundamental guidelines: the lessons of the past. The basic principles of copyright are inspired from property, with its origin in Roman and Civil Law. It is only through a comprehensive understanding of this primary source that further developments in intellectual property rights can be anticipated. The Canadian Copyright Act inherits from both the English – and consequently American – copyright system and the French droit d’auteur system. The latter (sic) has had a great influence on legal interpretation in Canada. An issue largely disputed over the last decade has been the expansion of the information highway and the requisite rethinking of copyright rules, based on subjective and generally coercive rights. History illustrates that things do not radically change and copyright is an example where the ordinary property model remains a perfect example of a logical construction. This article examines the early metamorphosis of the property right, and the gradual encompassing of incorporeal objects within it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it