MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The healthcare system in Africa: the case of guinea

2015· article· en· W2253560394 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Camara, Ansoumane Camara, Nafissatou Camara

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHygieneIndependence (probability theory)Environmental healthPoliticsNew guineaHealth careEconomic growthGeographyMedicinePolitical scienceDevelopment economicsSocioeconomicsEnvironmental protectionHistorySociologyEthnologyEconomicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The aim of this article is to review the health system of Guinea from its past period to its recent period. The article gives an overview of the general situation of the country. It presents the political; economic, social situation of Guinea. It briefly addresses the country’s situation before its independence and goes on to describe its health situation from its independence on October 2nd, 1958 to 2014.Methods:This article is both retrospective and prospective. It highlights some epidemic diseases such as the Cholera, which has become almost endemic in the country. It also describes the current burden of diseases in the country.Results: The environment is a factor contributing to the health issues in the Republic of Guinea; among others, we can list unsafe water, hygiene, and excreta disposal; urban air pollution; and indoor smoke. This article shows that the current health issues in Guinea are due to the above factors. The Ebola outbreak is an illustration of the Global Health problem that started in Guinea in 2014.Conclusions:At the end of this article, changes and improvements to the healthcare system in the Republic of Guinea are proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.278
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Community Medicine and Public HealthSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207