Consumer Socialization in a Wired World: The Effects of Internet Use and Parental Communication on the Development of Skepticism to Advertising
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractA reasonable degree of consumer prudence is needed to function in today's commercially-oriented society such that skepticism is considered a positive and important outcome of the consumer socialization process particularly in adolescents. This study identifies the characteristics associated with skeptical adolescents and links these to various environmental factors focusing in particular on Internet use and the type and intensity of parenting communication adopted in the adolescent's household. In doing so we monitor the role of the Internet in the consumer socialization process and are thereby able to update previous studies based on a more limited range of media. The empirical results suggestthat the Internet hampers the development of skepticism to advertising unless it is used in the context oftelewebbing (simultaneous Internet and television use). We also find as parental communication moves toward a concept-oriented approach, the development of skepticism to advertising increases Additional informationNotes on contributorsDeborah MoscardelliDeborah Moscardelli (Ph.D., University of London) is an assistant professor of Marketing at Central Michigan University where her teaching and research interest include strategic Internet marketing and public policy.Catherine Liston-HeyesCatherine Liston-Heyes (Ph.D., McGill University) is a reader in Managerial Economics at Royal Holloway, University of London where her research interests include regulatory economics and the economics of defense procurement. Dr. Liston-Heyes is also the Director of Doctoral Programs at the Royal Holloway School of Management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it