MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253962638 · doi:10.1063/1.3232107

Radiative Capture Process at the Coulomb Barrier: the Resonant [sup 12]C+[sup 16]O Case

2009· article· en· W2253962638 on OpenAlexaff
D. Lebhertz, S. Courtin, F. Haas, M.-D. Salsac, Christian Beck, A. Michalon, M. ROUSSEAU, P. Marley, R. Glover, R. E. Kent, D. A. Hutcheon, C. A. Davis, J. Pearson, Matko Milin, Tamara Nikšić, S. Szilner, D. Vretenar

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinsPhysicsCoulomb barrierProlate spheroidRadiative transferAtomic physicsCluster (spacecraft)Cross section (physics)CoulombSpectrometerNuclear physicsOpticsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent experiment performed at Triumf using the Dragon 0° spectrometer and its associated BGO array we have measured for the first time the full gamma decay of the radiative capture channel close to the Coulomb barrier. This measurement has been performed at 3 energies Ecm = 8.5, 8.8 and 9 MeV. We have extracted a radiative capture cross section more than five times larger than what had been previously observed. A selective contribution of the entrance spins 5− and 6+ has also been evidenced whereas 1− to 3− spins are predicted to be predominant by coupled‐channel calculations. At Ecm = 9 MeV, stronger structural behaviour appears which is characterised by a larger total cross section and also by the particularly strong feeding of the 28Si prolate 4+ state at 9.16 MeV. This level is explained by several models in terms of 12C‐16O cluster sub‐structure. Our data is compared to such cluster‐model predictions and the agreement is quite good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207