The Genesis of the Indian English Lexicography: socio-cultural and linguistic aspects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The initial stage of the Indian English lexicography formation features its own peculiarities and distinctiveness. The revelation of both sociocultural and linguistic aspects of lexicography in India is ensured by the implementation of the critical analysis of the first lexicographic work bearing the title ‘dictionary’ published by George Clifford Whitworth An Anglo-Indian Dictionary: A Glossary of Indian Terms Used In English, and of Such English or Other Non-Indian Terms as Have Obtained Special Meanings in India. The dictionary exposes the formation of the of the Indian variant of the English language. The process of lexicographic interpretation of the variants of the English language common to the colonized lands began in the late eighteenth century and it was characterized by the peculiarity of the distribution of primary and secondary variants. In this case, the hallmark of the whole early period of lexicography is the inclusion of a large volume of encyclopedic facts in the monolingual dictionaries. Thus, on the territories where the modern primary variants of English were spreading the process of development of national lexicography started in the eighteenth century in the U.S.A. The first dictionaries were created to meet the needs of the educational system. The lexicography of emerging Canadian English was aimed at ensuring a successful trade of the British colonists with the indigenous population. The needs of the administration and the judiciary system in Australia led to the publication by James Hardy Vaux of dictionary of thieves' cant "A New and Comprehensive Vocabulary of the Flash Language" in 1819. The purpose of this article is to determine the characteristics of the initial stage of formation of lexicography which developed on the basis of Indian English. The first lexicographical work, which bears the name "Dictionary" was the work of George Clifford Whitworth "An Anglo-Indian Dictionary: A Glossary of Indian Terms Used In English, and of Such English or Other Non-Indian Terms as Have Obtained Special Meanings in India". The analysis of this dictionary suggests that the formation of the Indian lexicography in the initial stages coincided with the general trends of lexicographic interpretation of the colonial variants: reflecting the particular cultural and linguistic environment in which it was created, and the peculiarity of the emerging variant of the English language, the dictionary was designed to meet the needs of the British colonists of that time. A significant encyclopedic component of the Anglo-Indian dictionary demonstrates a constant interest on the part of the British administration in all the cultural aspects of India. Identifying the features and trends of the development of Indian lexicography is also possible by resorting to a critical and comparative analysis of other dictionaries of the Indian variant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".