Coronary artery bypass surgery without cardioplegia: hospital results in 8515 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cardioplegic myocardial protection is used in most cardiac surgical procedures. However, other alternatives have proved useful. We analysed the perioperative results in a large series of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and non-cardioplegic methods. METHODS: From January 1992 to October 2013, 8515 consecutive patients underwent isolated CABG with CPB without cardioplegia, under hypothermic ventricular fibrillation and/or an empty beating heart. The mean age was 61.9 ± 9.5 years, 12.4% were women, 26.3% diabetic, 64% hypertensive; and 9.6% had peripheral vascular disease, 7.8% cerebrovascular disease and 54.3% previous acute myocardial infarction (AMI). One-third of patients were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III/IV. Three-vessel disease was present in 76.5% of the cases and 10.9% had moderate/severe left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%). A multivariate analysis was made of risk factors associated to in-hospital mortality and three major morbidity complications [cerebrovascular accident, mediastinitis and acute kidney injury (AKI)], as well as for prolonged hospital stay. RESULTS: The mean CPB time was 58.2 ± 20.7 min. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.7 ± 0.8 (arterial: 1.2 ± 0.5). The left internal thoracic artery (ITA) was used in 99.4% of patients and both ITAs in 23.1%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.7% (61 patients), inotropic support was required in 6.6% and mechanical support in 0.8, and 2.0% were re-explored for bleeding and 1.3% for sternal complications (mediastinitis, 0.8%). AKI, the majority transient, occurred in 1595 patients (18.9%). The incidence rates of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were 2.6 and 2.5%, respectively, and atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred in 22.6% of cases. Age, LV dysfunction, non-elective surgery, previous cardiac surgery, peripheral vascular disease and CPB time were independent risk factors for mortality and major morbidity. The mean hospital stay was 7.2 ± 5.7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated CABG with CPB using non-cardioplegic methods proved very safe, with low mortality and morbidity. These methods are simple and expeditious and remain as very useful alternative techniques of myocardial preservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".