Corticomotoneuronal connections in primary lateral sclerosis (PLS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is uncertain. The slow progression and dominant upper motor neuron features of PLS are associated with a high threshold to cortical magnetic stimulation and sometimes slow central motor conduction. In ALS the cortical threshold may be reduced early in the disease and central conduction is usually normal. Corticomotoneuronal function appears to be impaired differently in PLS and ALS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We assessed corticomotoneuronal function by analyzing the primary peak in the peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) in 12 PLS and 12 ALS patients. Surface recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and central motor conduction time (CMCT) were determined. PSTHs were constructed from 4-5 different, voluntarily recruited motor units in each patient and the onset latency, number of excess bins, duration and synchrony of the primary peak were measured. RESULTS: The mean cortical threshold of single motor units in PLS was 73.6%, significantly higher than in ALS (60.3%; p < 2.2 x 10(-5)). Profoundly delayed primary peaks occurred in both PLS and ALS. Onset latency and desynchronization of the primary peak were similar in PLS and ALS, but the duration of the primary peak was significantly longer in PLS (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Desynchronized primary peaks indicate dysfunction or demise of corticomotoneurones. Higher threshold and longer duration of the primary peak in PLS probably reflect different excitability and greater loss of corticomotoneuronal connections than in ALS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".