MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2254482549 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.awp373

Abstract WP373: A Novel High-risk TIA and Minor Stroke Rapid Assessment Day-unit to Improve Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes

2013· article· en· W2254482549 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Cayley, Jemini Abraham, Libby Kalman, Cheryl Jaigobin, Martín del Campo, Frank L. Silver, Leanne K. Casaubon

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Emergency medicineAtrial fibrillationEmergency departmentPopulationRisk assessmentMinor strokeMedical emergencyInternal medicineStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: About one in four ischemic strokes are preceded by a TIA; 43% of TIAs occur within one week before stroke. Patients with a TIA require urgent assessment, risk stratification, and preventative treatment, but often cannot access a Stroke Prevention Clinic in a timely fashion. Therefore, these patients are often admitted to hospital for evaluation but it is unclear if inpatient evaluation is optimal or specifically necessary for this patient population. Methods: We developed a novel high-risk TIA and Minor Stroke (TAMS) day-unit to provide rapid access to patient assessment, investigations, initiation of prevention strategies, and stroke prevention education. The TAMS Unit patient assessments were based on a collaborative model led by stroke Nurse Practitioners and an attending stroke Neurologist. All patients had cerebrovascular imaging (CT angiography, MR angiography, or carotid Doppler if there were exclusions to CT or MR angiography), and as appropriate, echocardiography and Holter monitoring initiated at the TAMS Unit visit. We evaluated the feasibility of this novel care model. Outcomes including time to assessment, investigations, and treatment for high-risk TIA/stroke etiologies and stroke risk factors, as well as return emergency department visits or readmissions within 30 days were assessed. Results: Between Sept. 6, 2011 and Aug. 8, 2012, 142 patients were seen in the TAMS Unit. Median time from emergency department visit to TAMS Unit assessment was 1 day. The final diagnosis was TIA in 41% of patients and minor stroke (NIHSS < 4) in 27.5% of patients. Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 8 (5.6%) patients; anticoagulation was initiated promptly upon diagnosis. High-grade carotid stenosis was diagnosed in 4 (2.8%) patients and these patients were referred for urgent endarterectomy. There were 12 (8.5%) patients that had a return visit to the emergency department within 30 days; 2 (1.4%) with stroke, 8 (5.6%) with recurrent TIA or fluctuating symptoms, and 2 (1.4%) with other diagnoses. Conclusion: Our novel TAMS Unit is a feasible care model that provides rapid access to assessment and treatment of high-risk TIA and minor stroke patients, and is another level of care between hospital admission and the outpatient Stroke Prevention Clinic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→