Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article uncovers the distinctive relationship between sovereignty and translation that is embedded in Hölderlin’s “Das Höchste” (a translation of and commentary to Pindar’s fragment “Nomos Basileus”). “Das Höchste” asserts that sovereign power is always a mediation of the foundational principles of justice, which it can access only indirectly when enacting law. Translation corresponds to this figuration of sovereignty to the extent that it always mediation rather than a direct conveyance of language, text, and context. As this article demonstrates by juxtaposing “Das Höchste,” Hölderlin’s letter to Casimir Böhlendorff on modernity’s relationship to Greek antiquity, and his sketch “Urtheil und Seyn,” Hölderlin understands both sovereignty and translation in terms of problems of knowledge. The concept of discipline (Zucht) as raised in “Das Höchste” indicates how the sovereign/translation might proceed in strict awareness of the fundamental divide between antiquity and the present, text and translation, and justice and law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".