Bibliographic record
Abstract
et de l'immobilite de Douve, c'est, oui, un sentiment de derive et de chaos, mais aussi le sentiment d'une non-coincidence entre la violence apparemment psychique ainsi theatralisee et ces impressions de "Iumiere" et de "beaute" jusqu'ici consciemment vecues.Y aurait-i1 quelque chose dans le langage, la prise de possession qu'elle operait dans Traiteet qu'on autorisait -qui "v[oudrait] la desagregation, le renoncement"?Se trouve menacee, dans Traite, "cette intuition d'unite" que Bonnefoy, depuis, n'a jamais cesse de caresser.Le choc subi fournit pourtant, et tout de suite, I'occasion de repartir, de s'assumer, de prendre sur soi cette tache qui consiste a "dissiper ce vertige, [a] separer dans les mots ombre et IUmiere, [a] convaincre les fantasmes de ne pas se raidir dans leur refus de la vie".Le fantasmagorique a l'etat pur, cette errance psychique et ontique -loin, infiniment, cela va sans dire, de toute appreciation, et notion, de "vie errante" ou de "derive majeure de la nuee" -ne permet pas de percer I'opacite de notre presence au monde.Le besoin qu'eprouve Bonnefoy, se relisant, est plutot celui d"'observer, [de] reflechir" -de penser le reve plutot que de rever la pensee comme iI dit ailleurs.Les automatismes du Traite du pianiste risque de II emprisonner dans des "formes closes", le mauvais absolu d'un langage qui fige et immobilise la 00 iI cherche a se "restitue[r•.•]cet espoir de mes premieres annees que vivre et parler ont du sens".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".