Maternal cardiac autonomic function and fetal heart rate in preeclamptic compared to normotensive pregnancies.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia during pregnancy increases a woman's risk of cardiovascular disease in two ways. Women who develop preeclampsia are at increased risk for the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease later in life. As well, fetal adaptations (e.g., growth restriction) may lead to the development of cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., obesity, increased cholesterol) in the offspring. Although atypical maternal cardiac autonomic function has been reported in preeclampsia, to date, its effects on fetal cardiac function have not been determined. PURPOSE: To characterize the pattern of short-term maternal cardiac autonomic modulation and spontaneous fetal heart rate changes in preeclamptic compared to normotensive women and to determine the relationship between them. METHOD: Twenty-seven mother-fetal pairs (n = 9 preeclamptic, n = 18 normotensive) at 32 to 40 weeks gestation were tested on one occasion. Maternal autonomic modulation of heart rate was measured for 20 minutes using electrocardiographic and beat-by-beat arterial systolic blood pressure recordings. Simultaneously, spontaneous fetal heart rate was obtained using a cardiotachograph. Women's cardiac autonomic responses to orthostatic stress were obtained for five minutes in a standing position. RESULTS: Comparisons of maternal cardiac measures in the preeclamptic versus the normotensive group showed that the preeclamptic group had a decreased parasympathetic nervous system indicator and an increased sympathetic nervous system indicator with increasing gestation. In response to orthostatic stress, women in both groups showed a similar increase in arterial systolic blood pressure and a decrease in parasympathetic nervous system indicator and R-R interval when standing compared to lying. Fetuses in the normotensive compared to the preeclamptic group had more spontaneous fetal heart rate accelerations; the greater the decrease in the parasympathetic nervous system indicator from lying to standing, the greater the number of fetal heart rate accelerations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings serve to further our understanding of the cardiovascular pathophysiology of preeclampsia in both the mother and the fetus. Women who develop preeclampsia during pregnancy show atypical autonomic nervous system modulation of heart rate that is associated with a decrease in spontaneous fetal heart rate accelerations in late gestation. Implications for cardiovascular nursing practice include the monitoring of maternal cardiac autonomic function during pregnancy, especially during standing, as well as a need for continued surveillance of maternal cardiovascular function following pregnancy. The negative effect on fetal heart rate accelerations has implications for the interpretation of standardized obstetrical tests of fetal well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".