MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Therapeutic Effect of Plasma Exchange (PLEX) in Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO): Immediate and Long Term Response (S63.005)

2014· article· en· W2255518533 on OpenAlexaff
Moogeh Baharnoori, Marika Hohol, Katerina Pavenski, Paul O’Connor

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromyelitis opticaTherapeutic plasma exchangeTerm (time)MedicineInternal medicineMultiple sclerosisImmunologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the immediate and long term therapeutic effect of plasma exchange in patients with NMO BACKGROUND: The natural course of NMO is significantly worse compared to other CNS demyelinating diseases. Appropriate management of attacks and maintenance treatment are considered very crucial. High dose steroid is commonly used as first-line treatment for attacks. Sometimes severe attacks may not respond or progress despite this treatment. PLEX is used as rescue therapy in these cases. Most of available data on the effect of PLEX in steroid-refractory attacks are either small case-series or are part of cohort of patients with other CNS demyelinating diseases. DESIGN/METHODS: 36 eligible patients with NMO or NMO spectrum disorders (modified diagnostic criteria, Wingerchuck et al, 2006) were identified by retrospective chart review. One plasma volume exchange with 5% albumin replacement, was given for 5-7 treatments, usually on alternating days. We studied clinical improvement at time of discharge and long term (6 month and 1 year). Clinical improvement was evaluated in two distinct ways by using ordinal scales; 1) Overall functional improvement, 2) Improvement in neurological systems (sensory, motor and vision). Possible determinants of favorable response were examined. RESULTS: Our preliminary data shows that patients with positive NMO serology have fewer relapses after plasma exchange compared to NMO negative patients. 60% of patients showed mild or moderate functional improvement at time of discharge. Significant improvement in overall function was associated with brisk/preserved reflexes and positive NMO serology. Motor and sensory improvement at the time of discharge was noted in 38% and 34% of patients respectively. Both of these measures were associated with brisk/preserved reflexes. Furthermore, younger patients showed better recovery in their sensory deficits at time of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma exchange is a modestly beneficial rescue therapy for acute, steroid-refractory attacks of NMO. Our preliminary data suggests some clinical and serological features that may help to predict more favorable outcome after PLEX. Study Supported by:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→