MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2255671294 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv3010

Multi-epoch observations of extremely high-velocity emergent broad absorption

2016· article· en· W2255671294 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Rogerson, Patrick B. Hall, Paola Rodríguez Hidalgo, Patrik Pirkola, W. N. Brandt, N. Filiz Ak

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrough (economics)PhysicsAstrophysicsQuasarSpectral lineIonizationBlueshiftEpoch (astronomy)Absorption spectroscopyAstronomyGalaxyOpticsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the discovery of the highest velocity C iv broad absorption line to date in the z = 2.47 quasar SDSS J023011.28+005913.6, hereafter J0230. In comparing the public DR7 and DR9 spectra of J0230, we discovered an emerging broad absorption trough outflowing at ∼60 000 km s−1, which we refer to as trough A. In pursuing follow up observations of trough A, we discovered a second emergent C iv broad absorption trough outflowing at ∼40 000 km s−1, namely trough B. In total, we collected seven spectral epochs of J0230 that demonstrate emergent and rapidly (∼10 d in the rest-frame) varying broad absorption. We investigate two possible scenarios that could cause these rapid changes: bulk motion and ionization variability. Given our multi-epoch data, we were able to rule out some simple models of bulk motion, but have proposed two more realistic models to explain the variability of both troughs. Trough A is likely an augmented ‘crossing disc’ scenario with the absorber moving at 10 000 < v(km s−1) < 18 000. Trough B can be explained by a flow-tube feature travelling across the emitting region at 8000 < v(km s−1) < 56 000. If ionization variability is the cause for the changes observed, trough A's absorber has ne ≥ 724 cm−3 and is at requal ≥ 2.00 kpc, or is at r < 2.00 kpc with no constraint on the density; trough B's absorber either has ne ≥ 1540 cm−3 and is at requal ≥ 1.37 kpc, or is at r < 1.37 kpc with no constraint on the density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207