A spatial analysis of the Late Mousterian levels of Riparo Bombrini (Balzi Rossi, Italy).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude presente une analyse de la repartition spatiale de divers types d'artefacts dans les niveaux du Mousterien tardif du Riparo Bombrini (Ligurie). Nous interpretons l'absence repetee d'artefacts sur un alignement positionne similairement dans tous les niveaux comme marquant l'entree de l'abri avant son effondrement. Dans les niveaux M1―3, M4 et M5, des foyers sont presents au fond de l'abri, un emplacement semblable a celui des 'sleeping hearths' recemment identifies dans d'autres sites mousteriens. Enfin, la repartition des artefacts semble varier en fonction de la nature des strategies de mobilite en place a divers moments de l'histoire du site. Notamment, quand le site etait occupe comme camps de base 'logisitique', les foyers sont presents et les objets semblent accumules preferentiellement devant et a l'exterieur de l'abri, alors que les autres emplois du site sont associes la presence de beaucoup plus d'artefacts a l'interieur de l'abri-meme. Ces observations renforcent donc l'idee que les neandertaliens etaient bien capables de structurer logiquement leur espace de vie et que la duree et la nature des occupations prehistoriques doivent etre explicitement consideres afin de pouvoir comprendre ce que signifient certains « patterns » dans la distribution des artefacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".