LVIS Jr ‘shelf’ technique: an alternative to Y stent-assisted aneurysm coiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms have traditionally not been amenable to coil embolization with the use of a single stent due to the high risk of coil prolapse. Y-configuration double stent-assisted coil embolization ('Y-stenting') of this aneurysm type has been shown to have generally good clinical outcomes, although the technique is complex with various challenges described in the literature. The compliant and flexible closed-cell design of braided stents such as the LVIS Jr allows for the creation of a 'shelf' across the aneurysm neck sufficient to prevent coil prolapse. We describe this novel 'shelf' technique and present a small case series of LVIS Jr stent-assisted wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysm coiling in eight patients. Our small, albeit important, case series demonstrates that the 'shelf' technique is feasible and safe with very good short-term clinical and angiographic outcomes, and may obviate the need for Y-stenting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".