MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256081476 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab203

203 SUPPLEMENTATION WITH LINOLENIC ACID, L-CARNITINE, ALONE OR ASSOCIATED, DURING IVM RESULTED IN DECREASE OF ROS LEVELS AND APOPTOTIC INDEX OF BOVINE IN VITRO PRODUCED EMBRYOS

2015· article· en· W2256081476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. C. S. Leão, N. A. S. Rocha Frigoni, Priscila Chediek Dall’Acqua, Marcela Ambrogi, Gisele Zoccal Mingoti

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitro maturationReactive oxygen speciesAndrologyApoptosisBlastocystEmbryogenesisCarnitineBiologyReproductive technologyTUNEL assayChemistryEmbryoBiochemistryCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplementation of in vitro maturation (IVM) medium with linolenic acid (ALA) has been used in order to reduce oocyte lipid content and have beneficial effects on maturation and acquisition of competence for embryonic development. Besides the effect of reducing cellular lipid content, l-carnitine (l-car) has an antioxidant effect by reducing the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protecting cells from apoptosis. However, the association of ALA and l-car has never been tested. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of supplementation of IVM medium of bovine oocytes with ALA, l-car or the association of both (ALA+l-car) on embryonic development and blastocysts reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and occurrence of apoptosis. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (n = 2241, in 11 replicates) were matured during 22 h at 38.5°C and 5% CO2 in air, in TCM-199 medium with bicarbonate, hormones and 10% FCS (control group), also supplemented with 100 µM ALA group; or 5 mM l-car (l-car group); or 100 µM ALA associated with 5 mM l-car (ALA+l-car group). After fertilisation (Day 0), zygotes were cultured 7 days in SOF that was supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 2.5% FCS, in 5% CO2 in air at 38.5°C. The cleavage and blastocysts rates were evaluated, respectively, at Days 3 and 7. Blastocysts were stained with 5 mM of H2DCFDA (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and TUNEL (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Roche Applied Science, Boston, MA, USA), to evaluate the ROS levels and the blastomers apoptotic index, respectively. The ROS (n = 115) and TUNEL (n = 102) stained blastocysts were evaluated under an epifluorescence microscope (excitation 495 nm/510–550 nm and emission 404 nm/590 nm), and the ROS levels (expressed as arbitrary fluorescence units) were measured by Q-Capture Pro image software (Q Imaging, Surrey, BC, Canada). The fluorescence intensity values were subtracted from mean values of background in the images. The variables were analysed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (P < 0.05) and data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of the supplements during IVM on cleavage and blastocysts rates (%), respectively, for control (81.1 ± 1.8 and 29.0 ± 3.1), ALA (80.5 ± 2.1 and 29.7 ± 2.3), l-car (79.5 ± 2.8 and 29.2 ± 2.3), and ALA+l-car (82.2 ± 1.1 and 30.5 ± 2.0) groups. The oocytes supplementation resulted in a decrease (P < 0.05) in ROS levels for ALA (0.84 ± 0.04), l-car (0.85 ± 0.03) and ALA+l-car (0.82 ± 0.02) groups, compared to the Control (1.00 ± 0.05). Consequently, the percentage of apoptotic blastomeres decreased (P < 0.05) after ALA (6.9 ± 1.0%), l-car (7.5 ± 1.2%) and ALA+l-car (4.6 ± 0.7%) supplementations, unlike to the Control group (12.0 ± 1.2%). In conclusion, the supplementation with ALA, l-car or ALA+l-car during IVM did not affect the blastocyst development, but led to a reduction in ROS levels and in the apoptotic index of such blastocysts. These findings may be due to some antioxidant effect of these supplements in the oocytes and/or the produced embryos. Financial support was through FAPESP (#2012/10084–4 and #2013/07382–6).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207