MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256653344

THE ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ON LITHUANIAN STATE ROADS

2012· article· en· W2256653344 on OpenAlexaff
Stanislav Mamčic, Henrikas Sivilevičius

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure CETRA · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithuanianTransport engineeringChristian ministryMinistry of TransportRoad trafficWork (physics)Traffic volumeRoad traffic safetyEngineeringGeographyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A great number of serious road accidents occur all over the world every year. The problem of road traffic safety is still acute in spite of some progress in this area in recent years. Road traffic accidents depend on the following factors: road traffic volume, road traffic speed, weather conditions, driving experience and driving culture of drivers. All these factors are associated with traffic safety, human lives and health. The main goal of this work is to provide the statistical analysis of traffic accidents and investigate the causes, structure, dynamics and seasonal character of traffic accidents on Lithuanian state roads with various road pavements. The data on traffic accidents, traffic volume, traffic speed, as well as the number of injured and killed people and economic losses caused by traffic accidents on Lithuanian state roads in 2004 – 2011, provided by the Lithuanian Road Administration under the Ministry of Transport and Communications, Lithuanian Department of Statistics, Transport and Road Research Institute and Police Department under the Ministry of Interior are analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure CETRASame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207