Uveitis in Spondyloarthritis: An Overview
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autoimmune anterior uveitis (AU) accounts for at least half of the cases of noninfectious uveitis, and similarly to spondyloarthritis (SpA), its occurrence is related to HLA-B27 positivity. AU is significantly more frequently found in HLA-B27-positive subjects with SpA and is characterized by unilateral eye involvement, marked tendency to recur with involvement of both eyes in alternate fashion, and has good prognosis in the majority of cases. The estimated frequency of SpA in patients with AU is around 50%, whereas AU in SpA has been reported in at least 30% of cases. Across the SpA disease spectrum, AU has a frequency peak of 33.4% in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, while the estimated prevalence in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inflammatory bowel disease-associated SpA is 2%-25%, and 25%, respectively. In early PsA, the frequency of AU has been found in 9% of patients. The wide range of prevalence reported in PsA may be explained by the variable sets of classification criteria used for patient selection and the different length of followup. AU may precede the clinical features of SpA, may be present at diagnosis, or may complicate the SpA clinical course. However, the occurrence of AU in SpA as well as AU flares has been reduced through treatment of SpA with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".