MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256716179 · doi:10.3138/cjh.ach.50.3.rev43

<i>White Lotus Rebels and South China Pirates: Crisis and Reform in the Qing Empire</i>, by Wensheng Wang

2015· article· en· W2256716179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrew B. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmperorEmpireReignChinaState (computer science)Ancient historyPoliticsHistoriographyWhite (mutation)HistoryPower (physics)FrontierEconomic historyPolitical economyLawPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

White Lotus Rebels and South China Pirates: Crisis and Reform in the Empire, Wensheng Wang. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2014. 339 pp. $39.95 US (cloth). Scholars of the empire (1644-1911) have conventionally divided its into two halves: first, the High Qing that lasted until the Qianlong emperor's death in 1799; second, a slow nineteenth-century decline culminating in the regime's collapse. Consequently, according historian Wensheng Wang, the transition from the Qianlong Jiaqing emperor has been unjustly overlooked as a dead middle period, which does not fit neatly into either epoch. In his study White Lotus Rebels and South China Pirates, Wang attempts remedy this oversight and to restore continuity across the two halves of by reconceptualizing the place of Emperor Jiaqing and his seemingly unremarkable reign (p. 4). Wang argues that once the Jiaqing emperor took power in 1799, he initiated a set of sustainable reforms that strengthened the state. Specifically, Wang examines the emperor's response two ongoing political crises at the time: the sectarian White Lotus rebellion in the Han River highlands and the chronic threat of raiding pirates in the South China Sea. Whereas past historiography viewed these events as harbingers of eventual decline, Wang asserts that the two frontier threats, one inland and one maritime, actually a reorganization of the state which better prepared the dynasty deal with larger crises following the first Opium War (1842). In admirably ambitious fashion, then, Wang simultaneously analyzes short-term events, century-long trends, and judgments on the empire as a whole. After a historiographical introduction and background chapter, Wang divides his argument into two sections. In Part II, A View from the Bottom, he dedicates one chapter each the rebels and pirates, explaining both the ideological and social-economic conditions behind them. If these chapters lean toward sociocultural history (p. 5), then Part III, A View from the Top, adopts the tone of political history. Across four chapters, Wang contrasts the shortcomings of an octogenarian Qianlong emperor and his corrupt regent He Shen, on the one hand, versus the successful reforms of the Jiaqing emperor on the other. Whereas the late Qianlong regime nearly bankrupted the empire through costly wars, the Jiaqing emperor curbed military overexpansion pragmatically compromising with the rebels and pirates while simultaneously setting institutional limits on the power of inner court officials. These policies, laid out in chapter six, represent the major thrust (p. 113) of Wang's story. As the book progresses, Wang begins shift his claims about how exactly the Jiaqing reforms were related the rebels and pirates. Although he initially argues the two crises propelled change, his story in the end primarily revolves around the Jiaqing emperor. The rebels and pirates, therefore, served less as an impetus for reform than an opportune occasion for the Jiaqing emperor execute his plan. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207