MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2256978172

Модель Европейской школы: заложение основ многоязычного и поликультурного образования в Европе

2010· article· ru· W2256978172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Смокотин Владимир Михайлович

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filologiya · 2010
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismPedagogyPolitical scienceMultilingualismForeign languageEuropean communitySociologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper considers the European School Model, the main focus being on the causes and circumstances of its emergence and its development as a multilingual and multicultural school of a new type. Long before the reforms of the European national education systems in late 20th century, prerequisites for multilingual education of a new type were laid down, and the European School Model emerged, which was different on principle from traditional European schools based on national education systems of nation-states. The European School project began as an initiative of a group of parents involved in diplomatic service, who considered that national schools in European states did not meet linguistic, cultural and academic demands of their children sufficiently. From a private initiative, the experiment in creating a multilingual and multicultural school grew over into a large public project financed by the European Community. The paper presents an analysis of reasons, which ensured successful functioning of European Schools as centres for initial training of highly qualified multilingual and multicultural personnel for common European institutions. The most important component of the European School Model is a multilingual arrangement of teaching that pursues the aim to prepare students for life and activity in societies that are different from each other linguistically and culturally. To achieve high levels of functional proficiency in mastering at least two languages, the first foreign language is made obligatory during the entire school study period, and, starting with the third year of the secondary school, a part of the school subjects are taught in the first foreign language. As compared to other forms of the intensive foreign language teaching, the European School is known for a gradual transfer to the use of the foreign language as a medium of instruction. Balanced bilingualism in academic use of both the native and the first foreign language is achieved through introducing subjects requiring higher cognitive skills and abstract-logical thinking only in secondary school. The paper next considers the ways Euroschools achieve a multilingual and multicultural environment both in classroom and out of class. The Euroschool model envisages everyday communication and mutual interaction of students from different language sections on the playground, in the gym and in the corridors and recreation halls. The comparative studies of the results shown by the students of Euroschools and other schools with intensive language training which use foreign language as a medium of instruction, demonstrate higher effectiveness of Euroschools in multilingual teaching even when compared with the Canadian language immersion model, where students receive higher language exposure. Summing up, a conclusion can be made that the European School Model's experience in organizing multilingual education proves that the controversial demands of academic, linguistic and cultural development can be coordinated, and the aim of balanced multilingualism can be achieved. The success of the Euroschool model is determined by creating a language environment outside the classroom, the development of productive language skills and by teaching the first foreign language as a subject throughout the school course of studies, which contributes to constant perfection of the quality of language teaching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta FilologiyaSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207