MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Results of a phase II trial of trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had progressed during trastuzumab therapy

2008· article· en· W2257109151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen A. Gelmon, P. Fumoleau, Shivani Verma, Andrew Wardley, PierFranco Conte, David Miles, Lorenzo Gianni, Virginia McNally, G. Ross, José Baselga

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePertuzumabTrastuzumabRashInternal medicineClinical endpointMucositisGastroenterologyMetastatic breast cancerPhases of clinical researchNauseaOncologyCancerClinical trialBreast cancerChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1026 Background: P is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the specific dimerization epitope of HER2, blocking HER2 homo- and heterodimerization, thus preventing signal transduction. Xenograft studies indicate that the complementary mechanisms of action of P and H have a synergistic effect. Methods: This single-arm, Simon-type, two-stage phase II trial included pts with measurable, centrally tested HER2-positive MBC, ≥3 lines of prior therapy (including adjuvant therapy), disease progression during prior H therapy, and a baseline LVEF ≥55% that had not declined to <50% with H therapy. Consenting pts received H at 2 mg/kg qw (4 mg/kg loading dose [LD]) or 6 mg/kg q3w (8 mg/kg LD) plus P at 420 mg q3w (840 mg LD) starting within 9 weeks of the last dose of H. LVEF was assessed regularly in all pts. The primary endpoint was objective response and clinical benefit response rate (OR and SD ≥6 mths). Results: 66 pts have been enrolled and all have received ≥2 doses of study medication (41 are still on treatment). 63 pts have experienced ≥1 AE. Frequent AEs of all causes included diarrhea (63%), pain (35%), nausea/vomiting (30%), mucositis (32%), skin (27%), and rash (26%). Only 3 treatment-related AEs of severity G3, and none of G4, have been observed (diarrhea, pruritic rash due to contrast dye allergic reaction and a central line infection), all of which resolved and treatment continued. In addition 1 pt had a protocol-defined AE of special significance; an asymptomatic fall in LVEF of ≥10%-<50% based on a local reading which was not centrally confirmed. This pt was withdrawn due to progressive disease. No pts withdrew due to treatment-related or cardiac AEs. Preliminary RECIST response data (Baselga, ASCO 2007) are as follows: objective responses were seen in 6 of the 33 evaluable pts (1 CR, 5 PRs). Additionally, 7 pts achieved SD ≥6 mths and 10 pts SD <6 mths. Conclusions: The combination of H and P was well tolerated and active in pts with MBC whose disease had progressed during therapy with H. Biomarker data from this study are being analyzed. Further studies in pts with MBC and early breast cancer are ongoing. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Roche Roche, sanofi-aventis Roche F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Roche, sanofi-aventis F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Roche, Roche Canada Roche

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Non-randomized triallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Non-randomized trialmedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207