MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257212702 · doi:10.6342/ntu.2012.01839

記憶拘禁營:日裔加拿大人之歷史、文學、空間再現

2012· article· zh· W2257212702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
王芮思

Bibliographic record

Venue臺灣大學外國語文學研究所學位論文 · 2012
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedressDeportationLawComfort womenPrerogativeSettlement (finance)Political scienceHistorySociologyImmigrationPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The 1988 Japanese Canadian redress settlement marked a moment when collective memories of the expulsion, detention, dispossession, deportation, and dispersal of Japanese Canadians in Canada during and after World War II—in short, what I would call memories of Japanese Canadian internment—became recognized by and integrated into an official history of Canada. Despite such an apparently coherent account of a lost-and-found Japanese Canadian memory in Canadian national history, Roy Miki, a key Japanese Canadian scholar and activist, cautions that Japanese Canadian redress is not to be understood as simply a logical resolution of a conscientiously regretful government, and that it instead should be viewed as “an unusual achievement by a small group of citizens who, because of a nation’s violation of their citizenship rights, launched a movement to negotiate an acceptable settlement with the federal government.” Here, Miki’s reminder highlights the 1988 redress settlement as an intricately engineered official sanctioning of memories of Japanese Canadian internment, which takes as its price and prerogative the re/coding and the de/limiting of those memories. This thesis investigates memories of Japanese Canadian internment mediated through specific historical, literary, and spatial representations produced before, during, and after redress. In doing so, it not only analyzes what is remembered about internment, but also asks how these memories are constructed through disparate frames of representation. Chapter Two of this thesis focuses on the historiography of internment with specific attention paid to Ken Adachi’s The Enemy That Never Was (1976) and Ann Sunahara’s The Politics of Racism (1981). I argue that these texts have foregrounded Japanese Canadians’ identity shift from race in itself to class for itself during the redress movement. Chapter Three turns to literary representations of internment in Joy Kogawa’s novel Obasan (1981) and its critical reception. While Kogawa’s text has generated diverse, and sometimes conflicting, theorizations of Japanese Canadian textual politics in the arena of Asian Canadian Studies, I argue that these theorizations have yet to adequately account for the miscellaneous ways internment is being remembered by Japanese Canadians today. Chapter Four draws attention to spatial representations of internment in a commemorative site, Historic Joy Kogawa House (established in Vancouver in 2006). While the monumentalization of Joy Kogawa’s childhood house was deemed ethical by some and offensive by others, I argue that a simple ethical dichotomy would not sufficiently valorize both cultural activists’ and dissident Japanese Canadians’ vexed investments in the Kogawa House memoryscape. Through an analysis of these historical, literary, and spatial memories, this thesis underlines how representations of Japanese Canadian internment have culminated in power as well as crisis and have continued to be in process well past 1988.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue臺灣大學外國語文學研究所學位論文Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207