Bibliographic record
Abstract
This was prepared as a white paper for heads of state and delegations preparing for the 34-state Summit of the Americas held in 2001 in Quebec City. It argues that certain environmental challenges, such as climate change, natural disaster vulnerability, and the impact of development on resource availability, should be seen as 'non-traditional' security threats to states in the Inter-American system. The paper suggests that environmental security is not a new regional issue, but it has new urgency - pointing to natural disasters that taxed governments and economies heavily, but noting that environmental security concerns go well beyond disaster mitigation. Environmental challenges raise concerns for the health, well being and economic viability of communities in the region - those directly affected, and those called upon to respond. It notes that some progress has been made at a regional level, and some governments have begun to consider environmental issues in strategic planning. Yet no deliberate effort contemplates the range of environmental security challenges facing the region, or seeks to devise a response. Given the increasing importance of these challenges, and their impact on populations, economies and resources, the paper examines the emerging concept of environmental security and its particular relevance for the Western Hemisphere. It outlines action to date and calls for strategic interdisciplinary response in the near term. At the heart of meaningful progress is coordination among environmental, economic and defense institutions to analyze potential threats and address priority concerns. The paper urges policy makers setting the agenda for the Quebec City Summit to heed environmental security concerns and consider an appropriate response within the context of the Summit agenda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".