MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257506837 · doi:10.14288/1.0101978

Bone circulation in hemorrhagic shock.

2011· article· en· W2257506837 on OpenAlexaff
William Yu

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculation (fluid dynamics)Shock (circulatory)Hemorrhagic shockMedicineMechanicsInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone circulation in Hemorrhagic Shock was studied in 35 male mongrel dogs. The term hemorrhagic shock is defined in this thesis as persistent profound hypotensive syndrome, due to acute hemorrhage of more than one third of blood volume. The method of induction of shock consisted of removal of one third of estimated blood volume (8% of body weight) at a rate of 25 - 50 ml/min, and subsequently dropping the systemic blood pressure in a stepwise manner until the maintaining level of 30 - 35 mmHg is reached. The central venous pressure, pulse and respiratory rates were also recorded. Bone circulation was studied by (1) recording the blood flow through a cannula inserted into the tibial nutrient vein or artery and (2) recording the intramedullary pressure of tibia. When one third of estimated blood volume was removed, the bone blood flow through the nutrient vessel decreased to 22.5 ± 3.4% of control level. The decreased bone blood flow persisted as long as the hemorrhagic shock was maintained for 4-18 hours. The decreased bone blood flow was also evidenced by a profound and persistent fall of the intramedullary pressure of bone. Reinfusion into the animal of lost blood within fifteen minutes to six hours after hemorrhage resulted in a complete or partial recovery of the control systemic blood pressure as well as the control rate of bone blood flow and the control level of intramedullary pressure of bone. The curve showing relationship between the changes in bone blood flow and the systemic blood pressure is an exponential one with concavity towards the flow axis. This indicates that bone has a vasomotor control mechanism of increasing peripheral resistance during hemorrhagic shock. This was substantiated by the following observations: (1) The severity of decrease in bone blood flow on the side of lumbar sympathectomy was much milder (16% less) compared to the side of the intact sympathetic nerve; (2) Dibenzyline (phenoxybenzamine) a sympatholytic drug or alpha-receptor blocking agent alters the pressure-flow curve of bone circulation in chock to a linear pattern which indicates that the drug blocks the bone vasoconstricting mechanism(s). It is concluded that bone blood flow decreases in hemorrhagic shock and is not merely due to a decrease in circulatory blood volume, but also due to sympathetic and catecholamine hormonal vasoconstrictor mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207