MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257629430 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.761

Complete self-preservation on the axis of a turbulent round jet

2016· article· en· W2257629430 on OpenAlexaff
L. Djenidi, R. A. Antonia, N. Lefeuvre, Jean Lemay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTaylor microscaleTurbulenceReynolds numberJet (fluid)Turbulence kinetic energyKinetic energyDissipationEnergy (signal processing)Order (exchange)Mathematical physicsClassical mechanicsMechanicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-preservation (SP) solutions on the axis of a turbulent round jet are derived for the transport equation of the second-order structure function of the turbulent kinetic energy ( $k$ ), which may be interpreted as a scale-by-scale (s.b.s.) energy budget. The analysis shows that the mean turbulent energy dissipation rate, $\overline{{\it\epsilon}}$ , evolves like $x^{-4}$ ( $x$ is the streamwise direction). It is important to stress that this derivation does not use the constancy of the non-dimensional dissipation rate parameter $C_{{\it\epsilon}}=\overline{{\it\epsilon}}u^{\prime 3}/L_{u}$ ( $L_{u}$ and $u^{\prime }$ are the integral length scale and root mean square of the longitudinal velocity fluctuation respectively). We show, in fact, that the constancy of $C_{{\it\epsilon}}$ is simply a consequence of complete SP (i.e. SP at all scales of motion). The significance of the analysis relates to the fact that the SP requirements for the mean velocity and mean turbulent kinetic energy (i.e. $U\sim x^{-1}$ and $k\sim x^{-2}$ respectively) are derived without invoking the transport equations for $U$ and $k$ . Experimental hot-wire data along the axis of a turbulent round jet show that, after a transient downstream distance which increases with Reynolds number, the turbulence statistics comply with complete SP. For example, the measured $\overline{{\it\epsilon}}$ agrees well with the SP prediction, i.e. $\overline{{\it\epsilon}}\sim x^{-4}$ , while the Taylor microscale Reynolds number $Re_{{\it\lambda}}$ remains constant. The analytical expression for the prefactor $A_{{\it\epsilon}}$ for $\overline{{\it\epsilon}}\sim (x-x_{o})^{-4}$ (where $x_{o}$ is a virtual origin), first developed by Thiesset et al. ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 748, 2014, R2) and rederived here solely from the SP analysis of the s.b.s. energy budget, is validated and provides a relatively simple and accurate method for estimating $\overline{{\it\epsilon}}$ along the axis of a turbulent round jet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207