MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2257748591

Wood, Robert E.: Hegel's Introduction to the System: Encyclopaedia Phenomenology and Psychology

2015· article· en· W2257748591 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Baur

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œreview of metaphysics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegelianismEncyclopediaPhilosophyPhenomenology (philosophy)EpistemologyGeistLiteratureArtLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WOOD, Robert E. Hegel's Introduction to the System: Encyclopaedia and Psychology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014. xi + 210 pp. Cloth, $60.00; paper, $24.95--This is a very fine introduction to Hegel's system of philosophy. Unlike so many other commentators on Hegel's work, Robert E. Wood takes seriously Hegel's own suggestions about how one should be initiated into the system. It is well known that Hegel's 1807 of was written as a kind of ladder by means of which the reader might ascend to the point of view of Hegel's system. Less well known is the fact that Hegel later reformulated some of his central arguments from the and reprised them in his Philosophy of Spirit, which constitutes the third part of his Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences. In this book, Wood provides a brief account of Hegel's life and thought, a general overview of Hegel's Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences, a new translation of key sections of the Philosophy of Spirit, and section-by-section commentary on the newly translated material. In the first chapter of this book, Wood sets the stage by contextualizing Hegel's life and work. Though the biographical overview is highly condensed, Wood rightly underscores some of the central issues that animated Hegel's philosophical project, including Hegel's concern over a fundamental question: How must the cosmos be constituted so that the ongoing development of human rationality--in science, technology, government, and art--is possible? In the next three chapters, Wood provides a summary of each of the three main parts which make up Hegel's Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences: the Logic, the Philosophy of Nature, and the Philosophy of Spirit. With the fifth chapter of this book, Wood begins to provide his translation and running commentary. The newly translated material is taken from the three subsections which make up the first part--the Subjective Spirit part--of Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit. These three subsections are: Anthropology (chapter five in Wood's book), Phenomenology (chapter six), and Psychology (chapter seven). In these three central chapters, Wood has wisely opted to place his section-by-section commentary in close proximity to each translated section upon which it is a commentary. So immediately after providing a section of translated text, Wood provides his commentary on that text; he then goes on to provide the next section of translated text, which again is immediately followed by commentary on that text. With this ordering of text and commentary, the reader is spared the annoyance of having to thumb through several pages in order to move back and forth between translated text and commentary on that text. The book's two final chapters (chapters eight and nine) are dedicated to summarizing (though without any newly translated material) the second and third parts of Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit. These two parts, which follow the Subjective Spirit part, are the part on Objective Spirit (including the realms of right, morality, and ethical life) and the part on Absolute Spirit (including the realms of art, religion, and philosophy). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œreview of metaphysicsSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207