MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258080597

Therapeutic Electrophysical Agents, Evidence Behind Practice. Second Edition

2012· article· en· W2258080597 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jenn Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremiseComputer scienceSection (typography)Action (physics)PsychologyData scienceEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is based on the book “The Team Physician’s Handbook,” but includes more appropriate best practice suggestions based on more recent research and advances in treatment strategies. Geared towards the sport clinician, Netter’s Sports Medicine deals with the roles, ethics and responsibilities when dealing with a sports team. The most unique feature of this book is found in Section VIII, which has chapters to separate specific sports. Current research and statistics are reported about the incidence and type of injuries, commonly involved in each sport. At the end of each chapter, a list is featured of recommended readings for further education about that particular sport. This section is an outstanding source of information for the sport clinician, wanting to know the basic premise, and biomechanics for different sports. Being a book in the Netter Collection, this textbook includes many of the famous illustrations and anatomical diagrams from Dr. Frank Netter, which are well known in the rehabilitation world. Various radiographic photographs are also plentiful in this textbook, allowing the reader to gain a further understanding of specific injuries. This book could be used as a quick reference guide to any athletic situation, however it could be argued that the book contains too much information is is difficult to locate the information necessary. The book is very meticulously organized though, using colour coding, a detailed index and thorough headings throughout the text. The reader is guaranteed to learn something new each time this book is opened.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Chiropractic AssociationSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207