Bibliographic record
Abstract
The final Purpose of correction is reintegration of criminals into community, but it is very difficult to realize the idea in actual practices of correction. On the contrary, the gloomy reputation looks more persuasive that the execution of sentences could not contribute to improvement of criminals. The increasing of worldwide interest in the application of restorative principles to the prison environment suggests that traditional corrective programs have fatal limitations. The idea of restorative justice that is repairation of peaceful community and reintegration through the voluntarily taking responsibility of offenders could be well harmonize with the ultimate purpose of correction. Restorative correction not only tries to resocialize or rehabilitate offenders but also seeks to restore the peaceful relationship of community members and reintegration of the criminals. It hastens direct or indirect communication between those impacted by the crime. Through those processes restorative correction pursues repairing harm caused by offenders actions and successful resocialization of prisoners. For the development of correctional services in Korea, it seems to be requisite that principles and practices of restorative justice are applied in prisons. The prior conditions for the successful aplication are as follows: At first, it has decisive importance raising the awareness of th prison staffs regarding restorative justice. Scondly, restorative correction must be established and developed from the synthetic persfective of whole corecctional system. Because it is concerned with not only a few or single specified unit or institution but also whole correctional functions of korean MOJ related with correctional service. Thirdly, developing consultation structures between the internal and external services (ncluding police, prosecution office, court and various civil services etc.) will be an indispensible requirment. Forth, it is also essential to make a success of restorative correction setting up co-operation system between offender and victims and community services. In the concrete, as the first step of aplication of restorative prinsiples in korean correctional system, anything else it is desirable to establish a committee, as like the National Steering Committee on Restorative Justice & Dispute Resolution of Canada, chargeing of research, organisation improvement and preparing pilot programs etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.153 | 0.064 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".