MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258143677

교정단계에서 회복적 사법의 가능성

2006· article· ko· W2258143677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue형사정책연구원 연구총서 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Coastal Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestorative justiceResocializationPrisonHarmInstitutionPsychologyPolitical scienceEconomic JusticePublic relationsCriminologySocial psychologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The final Purpose of correction is reintegration of criminals into community, but it is very difficult to realize the idea in actual practices of correction. On the contrary, the gloomy reputation looks more persuasive that the execution of sentences could not contribute to improvement of criminals. The increasing of worldwide interest in the application of restorative principles to the prison environment suggests that traditional corrective programs have fatal limitations. The idea of restorative justice that is repairation of peaceful community and reintegration through the voluntarily taking responsibility of offenders could be well harmonize with the ultimate purpose of correction. Restorative correction not only tries to resocialize or rehabilitate offenders but also seeks to restore the peaceful relationship of community members and reintegration of the criminals. It hastens direct or indirect communication between those impacted by the crime. Through those processes restorative correction pursues repairing harm caused by offenders actions and successful resocialization of prisoners. For the development of correctional services in Korea, it seems to be requisite that principles and practices of restorative justice are applied in prisons. The prior conditions for the successful aplication are as follows: At first, it has decisive importance raising the awareness of th prison staffs regarding restorative justice. Scondly, restorative correction must be established and developed from the synthetic persfective of whole corecctional system. Because it is concerned with not only a few or single specified unit or institution but also whole correctional functions of korean MOJ related with correctional service. Thirdly, developing consultation structures between the internal and external services (ncluding police, prosecution office, court and various civil services etc.) will be an indispensible requirment. Forth, it is also essential to make a success of restorative correction setting up co-operation system between offender and victims and community services. In the concrete, as the first step of aplication of restorative prinsiples in korean correctional system, anything else it is desirable to establish a committee, as like the National Steering Committee on Restorative Justice & Dispute Resolution of Canada, chargeing of research, organisation improvement and preparing pilot programs etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it