MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W22582601 · doi:10.14670/hh-27.1263

The involvement of microRNAs in malignant transformation.

2012· review· en· W22582601 on OpenAlexaff
Zina Jeyapalan Rutnam, Burton B. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNASuppressorBiologyCancerOncomirCancer researchMalignant transformationGeneNeoplastic transformationBreast cancerRegulation of gene expressionComputational biologyBioinformaticsGene expressionCarcinogenesisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the multiple steps in cancer progression, microRNAs (miRNAs) play significant roles in each stage. Reports of considerable differences in expression levels of miRNAs between normal and malignant tissues are understandable considering miRNAs are key regulators of gene expression. Dysregulation of miRNA expression levels in neoplasia occurs because many miRNAs are located in "fragile sites", which are frequently deleted in cancer. miRNAs are often down regulated in cancerous tissues and target oncogenic proteins are classified as tumour suppressor miRNAs, such as let-7. While, miRNAs that are frequently over-expression in neoplastic tissues compared to normal tissues and regulate tumour suppressor proteins are categorized as "oncomiRs". In this review, we summarize information about microRNAs involved in the emerging field of cancer stem cells, and microRNAs involved in breast cancer, an area of our expertise. The application of miRNAs to cancer therapeutics and diagnostics is emerging as an important field of gene therapy. The diverse nature of miRNAs in cancer is continually being elucidated to lead to the enigmatic treatment options for neoplastic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207