MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258579675 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2486742

Sparse Signal Recovery Based Imaging in the Presence of Mode Conversion With Application to Non-Destructive Testing

2015· article· en· W2258579675 on OpenAlexaff
Shahrokh Hamidi, Shahram Shahbazpanahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaponComputer scienceAlgorithmSignal processingSparse approximationBeamformingSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a sparse signal representation based method for imaging solid materials in the presence of mode conversion phenomenon using an array of ultrasonic transducers. Traditional imaging techniques, such as MUSIC, Capon, and delay-and-sum (DAS) beamformer, do not take into account mode conversion. Recently, the well-known Capon and MUSIC techniques have been modified such that they can be used in multimodal propagation environments. Referred to as MC-Capon and MC-MUSIC techniques, these methods yield a higher resolution and lower sidelobe levels, as compared to the DAS beamformer. Moreover, unlike the DAS beamformer, they do not suffer from Rayleigh resolution limit, which is independent of the SNR. The MC-MUSIC and MC-Capon methods are capable of taking into account the effect of all different propagation modes, and therefore, find the locations of the reflectors with high precision. These two techniques, however, suffer from all the shortcomings that the MUSIC technique and the Capon method have. To overcome these issues, we propose a sparse signal representation based technique that not only is able to take into account the effect of all modes but also does not suffer from the aforementioned shortcomings. Our method can be implemented using only one snapshot from the array and does not require several snapshots. Its sensitivity to SNR is much less than that of the MC-MUSIC and MC-Capon approaches. Furthermore, unlike the MC-MUSIC method, there is no need to know the number of reflectors in advance. We show, through numerical and experimental examples, that compared to the aforementioned algorithms, our approach offers higher resolution and has lower sidelobe levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207