Atomization of Bismuthane in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge: A Mechanistic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atomization of bismuthane in a planar dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) atomizer was investigated using a variety of probes, including atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) to monitor distribution of free atoms along the optical path and direct analysis in real time (DART) coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer to identify the structure of the species arising from the hydride generator as well as the atomizer. Results obtained with the DBD were compared to those from a conventional externally heated quartz tube atomizer (QTA). Free Bi atoms were essentially absent outside the central part of the DBD atomizer, suggesting their high reactivity. The gas phase analyte fraction transported beyond the confines of the DBD or QTA atomizers, quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), was less than 10%. The amount of Bi found in acidic leachates of the interiors of both atomizers, representing the fraction retained on their surfaces, was ca. 90%. These complementary experiments comprising the determination of recovered Bi in the nitric acid leachates from deposition in the atomizer on the one hand and quantification of the Bi fraction transportable outside the atomizer on the other, were in excellent agreement, providing 100% mass balance of detected analyte. The high fraction of Bi deposited in the atomizers indicates significant reactivity of free Bi atoms, which is in accord with the fact that almost no free Bi atoms exist beyond the physical boundaries of the DBD. The extent of interference from other hydride forming elements (As, Sb, Se) on Bi response by AAS using DBD and QTA atomizers was investigated, with the former atomizer providing superior performance. Compared to QTA, DBD provided 2 orders of magnitude and 1 order of magnitude, respectively, better resistance to interference from Se and Sb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".