Hydrology and fire regulate edge influence on microclimate in wetland forest patches
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differences in temperature, relative humidity, and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were observed within small patches of pondcypress (Taxodium distichum var. imbricarium) compared with adjacent, largely treeless, vegetation communities. These patches, locally called cypress domes, displayed increasing differences in microclimate between their exterior or edges and interiors with increasing distance toward their centers. We sought to assess whether seasonal inundation of these small swamps results in a hydrologic switch in which the presence of standing water overwhelms the effects of edge distance on microclimate variation. Hydrology does appear to exert substantial control over the edge effect on microclimate, but the effects of distance from the edge remained discernable during periods of inundation. We also studied the effects of a wildfire that occurred 2 y before data collection. We expected to find warmer and drier conditions in domes affected by recent fire. Contrary to our expectations, previously burned domes were either similar to unburned domes or, in some cases, cooler and more humid than unburned domes, possibly because of vigorous regrowth after fire in these highly productive, fire-adapted subtropical ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it