159 IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION FROM HOLSTEIN CALF OOCYTES RECOVERED BY LAPAROSCOPIC OVUM PICKUP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oocyte competence and reproductive biology in prepubertal heifer calves are not fully understood. Multiple publications have reported high oocyte yields recovered from calves aged 2–6 months old but low embryo development rates following in vitro embryo production. The objective of this study was to characterise the developmental competence of oocytes from young calves. We report herein the oocyte/embryo yields obtained from 6 Holstein heifer calves that were subjected to gonadotropin stimulation and laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) every 2 weeks, starting at 2 months of age and ending at 5 months of age. The LOPU was conducted under general anaesthesia with the animal lying in dorsal recumbency on a table with a 45-degree angle to facilitate the visualisation of reproductive organs. Briefly, looking through the laparoscope, the ovarian surface was exposed by pulling from the fimbria with an atraumatic grasping forceps. The follicle contents were aspirated using a 20 G needle mounted on a pipette, which was connected to a collection tube and a vacuum pump. Media and procedures for aspiration, in vitro maturation (IVM), IVF, and in vitro culture (IVC) were standard in use for commercial adult bovine embryo production. Because of the small number of animals and the multifactorial variables in play (age, number of previous treatments and aspirations, etc.), in this preliminary study we focused on the overall oocyte/embryo yield and the potential effects of LOPU on ovarian integrity. A total of 766 follicles were aspirated (avg. 17/calf per session) resulting in 625 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) recovered (avg. 14/calf per session; 82% recovery rate). A total of 457 (73%) COC were graded eligible for IVM, of which 353 cleaved (77%) and 109 (24%) reached a viable blastocyst stage at the end of IVC, of which 42 (38.5%) were graded as freezable. In balance, ~2 viable blastocysts/calf per session were produced. No adhesions or sequels were observed in the animals up to the last LOPU session, as well as 2 weeks after the last LOPU when the animals were evaluated by rectal palpation by an experienced OPU veterinary practitioner. Further studies will look into other aspects of oocyte developmental competence to better understand this biological process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".