Accurate estimation of the glottal flow derivative using iteratively reweighted 1-norm minimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of estimating the exact shape of the glottal flow derivative (GFD) using reweighted 1-norm minimization of the second derivative of the GFD is addressed in this paper. By using physiological models of the glottal flow derivative, such as the Liljencrants-Fant (LF) and Rosenberg models, it is intuitively found that the second derivative of those models is highly sparse. Based on this observation an iteratively reweighted 1-norm minimization algorithm is proposed to accurately estimate the vocal tract of the speech signal by exploiting the sparsity of the second derivative of the GFD (the residual of the linear prediction model). An experimental study using a data set of 40 vowels /a/ and /e/, 20 for each, is conducted, showing the efficiency, in terms of the number of iterations and the total run-time reduction, of the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, the results of estimating the GFD of two vowels /a/ & /e/ using Joint Source-Filter Model Optimization and our proposed method, demonstrate the accuracy, in terms of similarity to the physiological model and precise synthesis, of our proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".