MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Late toxicity after adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma

2006· article· en· W2259227988 on OpenAlexaff
B. Wysocka, Zahra Kassam, Gina Lockwood, James D. Brierley, Laura A. Dawson, Jolie Ringash

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineToxicityGastroenterologyInternal medicineRadiation therapyChemotherapyCancerUrologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14042 Background: There is limited late toxicity data following adjuvant radiochemotherapy for resected gastric cancer. Methods: We reviewed radiation dose volume histograms (DVHs) and toxicity outcomes for gastric cancer patients (stage Ib to IV) who received adjuvant conformal radiochemotherapy between November 2000 and May 2005. Charts were reviewed to determine survival, late clinical toxicity, and biochemical markers of renal or hepatic toxicity (creatinine, bilirubin, ALP, AST, ALT). DVHs for kidneys and liver were correlated with toxicity outcomes. Overall (OS), disease-free (DFS) and event (death or late toxicity) -free (EFS) survival were calculated. Results: 80 of 88 patients’ DVHs were available for review. Mean age was 58 years (range: 22 - 75), with 53 (66%) males and 27 (34%) females. Stage distribution was: IB - 13 (16%), II - 32 (40%), IIIA - 24 (30%), IIIB - 4 (9%) and IV - 7 (9%). 3D conformal radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) was used. In 69 patients, chemotherapy was standard as per the INT-116 study; 11 study patients received infusional 5FU (200mg/m2/day for 12 weeks) and cisplatin in escalating dose (4 cycles q 2 weeks, 0–30 mg/m2). All treatment was completed in 56 (70%) patients; 9 (11%) did not complete radiotherapy and 22 (27.5%) had chemotherapy dose omissions. Median follow up is 30 months (range 6–62). At 2 years, OS was 84% (95% CI 73%-90%), DFS was 66% (95% CI 53%-75%) and EFS was 61% (95% CI 49–72%). Clinical late toxicity occurred in 6 patients 9 to 53 months following treatment: bowel obstruction/perforation (2) and anastomotic stricture (4), in volumes treated to 45 Gy. No clinical symptoms of renal or hepatic toxicity were reported. Grade 1 (CTCAE v3.0) elevation of creatinine was observed in 8 (10%) patients; at least one liver test was altered in 22 (27.5%) patients, (grade 1–17; 2–4; 3–1). Abnormal bloodwork occurred 9 days to 55 months following treatment and did not correlate with higher kidney and liver doses. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients treated with conformal radiochemotherapy, small bowel and anastomotic toxicity was most common, with no clinical renal or hepatic toxicity observed. Biochemical renal and hepatic changes were not related to clinical toxicity or dose delivered. Further assessment with longer follow-up in a larger sample is planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207