MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Gray Matter Volume Correlates with Information Processing as Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) but Not with Physical Disability as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS): Analysis of Baseline Correlations from the ASCEND Natalizumab Study (P6.143)

2015· article· en· W2259240662 on OpenAlexaff
Raj Kapoor, Douglas L. Arnold, Aaron Miller, Mark Freedman, Myla Goldman, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Eva Havrdová, Douglas Jeffery, Finn Sellebjerg, Carmen Castrillo‐Viguera, Yun Chen, Diego Cadavid, Daniel D. Mikol

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpanded Disability Status ScaleNumerical digitAudiologyPsychologyTest (biology)MedicineArithmeticMathematicsPsychiatryMultiple sclerosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical correlates of brain tissue loss in progressive multiple sclerosis using baseline data from the ASCEND study of patients with SPMS. BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that most brain tissue loss in SPMS affects gray matter (GM) rather than cerebral white matter. Clinical correlates of GM loss in SPMS are not well understood. DESIGN/METHODS: ASCEND is a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of natalizumab in SPMS patients. The primary endpoint is a composite of the EDSS, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Additional endpoints measure whole-brain (WB) and GM volumes with MRI and assess cognitive function using the SDMT in all patients and a composite measure (MS-COG) in a substudy. Pairwise correlations between brain volumes and measures of physical disability and cognitive function were evaluated from pooled blinded ASCEND baseline data using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho). RESULTS: Baseline mean EDSS score was 5.6 (N=889 enrolled patients). Median baseline WB, total GM, and cortical GM volumes were 1426.58 mL, 654.50 mL, and 518.84 mL, respectively. Mean (SD) baseline SDMT score was 38.76 (13.661). GM volumes were moderately correlated with SDMT (rho: total GM, 0.47; cortical GM, 0.45) but not with EDSS (rho: total GM, −0.06; cortical GM, −0.05) or T25FW (rho: total GM, −0.11; cortical GM, −0.11). Correlations between brain volumes and 9HPT ranged from −0.20 to −0.21 (dominant hand) and from −0.21 to −0.22 (nondominant hand). Similar correlation patterns were observed in patient subgroups with higher (蠅6.0) or lower (≤5.5) baseline EDSS scores. Correlations involving additional measures including WB volume and MS-COG results will also be presented. CONCLUSIONS: In ASCEND patients at baseline, GM volumes correlated with measures of information processing but not with EDSS or T25FW, demonstrating the importance of measuring cognitive function in SPMS clinical trials. Study supported by: Biogen Idec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→