Evaluation of population density of Pichia anomala strain K and Candida oleophila strain O and their protection against Penicillium expansum Link on apples.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The application of Pichia anomala (strain K) and Candida oleophila (strain O) in practical conditions had previously offered high protection againsl Penicilliunt expansum only when an antagonist density of 104 cfir/cm2 rvas detectecl on the intact surlace of fruit.According to this, the initial concentration ofapplication in controlled conditions for each antagonistic yeast was defined in order to obtain this level.Whatever the stmin studied, the initial application concentration of l0t cfi.r/ml allowed to obtain a density of yeast on the intact surface of apple higher than 10r cfi.r/cm2 after 24 hours, whereas a density lower than 10t cfi:/cm2 was observed when an initial application concentration of 105 cfiL/ml on apple surface is used.Tfuee scenarios reflecting the practical conditions of biological appiication were then tested with different periods of incubation bet$een biological trearment, rvounding of fruit surlace and pathogen inoculation.\\rhatever the strain, the initial application concentration of 108cfi:/ml allowed to obtain the highest densities ofyeast's per wound ond thr highest protectile lel'els in comparison to the use of iniiial application concentration of 105 cfi./ml.The protective levels were positively conelated with the density of yeast determined in the wounded sites.Furthermore, these protective levels were influenced by wound wetness.The protective levels registered on wet tvounds ranged between 52 and 100% while those observed on dry wounds did not exceed 30%.Whatever the scenario used the yeast density per wound and the protective levels induced by strain O rvere higher than those observed for strain K.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".