MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12044: Absence of Coronary Artery Disease by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and the Warranty Period Associated With All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the CONFIRM Long-Term Follow-Up Registry

2014· article· en· W2259973048 on OpenAlexaff
Iksung Cho, Bríain ó Hartaigh, Heidi Gransar, Joshua Schulman‐Marcus, Valentina Valenti, Daniel S. Berman, Matthew J. Budoff, Stephan Achenbach, Mouaz H. Al‐Mallah, Daniele Andreini, Filippo Cademartiri, Tracy Q. Callister, Hyuk‐Jae Chang, Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan, Ricardo Cury, Augustin DeLago, Millie Gomez, Martin Hadamitzky, Jöerg Hausleiter, Niree Hindoyan, Gudrun Feuchtner, Yong-Jin Kim, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Jonathon Leipsic, Fay Y. Lin, Erica Maffei, Gianluca Pontone, Gilbert Raff, Leslee J. Shaw, Todd C. Villines, Allison Dunning, James K. Min

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronary artery diseaseConfidence intervalComputed tomographic angiographyWarrantyInternal medicineCardiologyPopulationAngiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is widely utilized for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Foremost, the very low risk associated with normal CCTA is an important component for the purpose of cardiovascular risk stratification. To date, however, data that accounts for long-term prognosis of normal CCTA is sparse. Purpose: Using data from a multi-center, global observational CCTA registry, we sought to determine the potential warranty period of normal CCTA. Methods: Among 12,086 patients who underwent CCTA, 7,651 patients without history of previous CAD, aged between 30-74 years, were included in the current analysis and followed consecutively over 5 years. Normal CCTA was defined as the absence of any plaque in the coronary arteries. Annual mortality was calculated and compared with overall patients. The primary event in this study was all-cause mortality (ACM). Results: During a median follow-up of 5.8 years (IQR, 5.3-6.3 years), 120 of all-cause deaths occurred among 3,051 patients with normal CAD. Mean age of the study population was 52±11 years, and 45% were men. Annual mortality rate was 0.68% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57~0.82), while annual mortality of overall patients was 1.31% (95% CI, 1.20~1.42) ( p <0.001). When we defined warranty period as a follow-up duration until the estimated mortality reached the threshold of 5% using a Kaplan Meier curve, the warranty period of normal CCTA for ACM was 7.2 years. In subgroup analysis, according to a baseline risk factor profile using Framingham risk scores (FRS), annual mortality rate was 1.31% (95% CI, 0.85~2.03) among patients with high FRS and 0.62% (95% CI, 0.51~0.76) among those with low to intermediate FRS. Conclusion: Absence of CAD by CCTA demonstrates a favorable survival rate with a minimum warranty period of at least 7 years. Persons presenting with a high cardiovascular risk profile displayed a relatively higher mortality, which is similar to overall population. Therefore, they should be considered a distinct group of individuals at-risk by physicians and researchers alike.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→