Contamination Delays the Release of Laricobius osakensis for Biological Control of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid: Cryptic Diversity in Japanese Laricobius spp. and Colony-Purification Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laricobius osakensis (Coleoptera: Derodontidae) was imported from Japan to the United States in 2006 for study in quarantine facilities as a potential biological control of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Laricobius osakensis was released from quarantine in 2010, but it was soon discovered that the colony also contained a cryptic species, Laricobius naganoensis. This led to the placement of L. osakensis back into quarantine and development of a method to purify the colony. To distinguish the two species, we designed a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay using mitochondrial DNA sequences and developed a non-lethal testing method. Twenty-one diagnostic nucleotide sites separated the two species, and they both exhibited extraordinary intra-specific haplotype diversity. Sequencing the ITS2 nuclear region did not produce evidence of hybridization between the species in the field or in the lab colony. Splitting the colony into small groups and testing their species composition was successful in isolating L. osakensis. Efforts should be made to maintain high genetic diversity in L. osakensis colonies. Continued genotyping of new colony stock will be necessary to fully characterize the diversity within both species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".