MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261667061 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v8n1p194

Unrestricted Floating Orbitals for the Investigation of Open Shell Systems

2016· article· en· W2261667061 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eva Perlt, Christina Apostolidou, Melanie Eggers, Barbara Kirchner

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsChemistryOpen shellAtomic orbitalMolecular orbitalComputational chemistryBasis setBasis (linear algebra)Complete active spaceSpace (punctuation)Ab initioCorrectnessMolecular physicsAtomic physicsDensity functional theoryQuantum mechanicsPhysicsMoleculeAlgorithmComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The floating orbital molecular dynamics approach treats the basis functions' centers in ab initio molecular dynamics simulations variationally optimized in space rather than keeping them strictly fixed on nuclear positions. An implementation of the restricted theory for closed shell systems is already available (Perlt et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 6997–7005). In this article, the extension of the methodology to the unrestricted theory in order to cover open shell systems is introduced. The methyl radical serves as a test system to prove the correctness of the implementation and to demonstrate the scope of this method. The available spin density plots and vibrational spectra are compared to those obtained from atom-centered bases. Finally, more complex systems as well as further properties to be studied in future investigations by floating orbitals are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207