MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261776391 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i2.55882

Active Bodies: A History of Women’s Physical Education in Twentieth-Century America (2012) by Martha Verbrugge

2016· article· en· W2261776391 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jessica Dunkin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesPsychologySociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active Bodies is a thoughtful and thought-provoking look at physical education for women in the United States from the late 19th century to the present.The product of extensive archival and oral history research that took author Martha Verbrugge across the country, Active Bodies is a welcome addition to the historical study of physical education.In particular, it contributes to our understanding of the generations of women physical educators who created spaces for women and girls to be active.It also explores the rich entanglements of race and gender in the history of physical education.Active Bodies offers a thematic reading of what the author considers the "most common sites" for physical education, "public schools and undergraduate institutions" (p.11).The first six chapters examine female physical educators; science and sex difference; menstruation; race; competition; and physical education in public schools before the 1950s.The final three chapters revisit physical educators, sex difference, and reproductive health in the latter half of the 20th century.Chapters 1 and 7 explore women physical educators.In Chapter 1, Verbrugge sheds light on who was drawn to the profession and what their training likely entailed before turning her attention to educators' experiences on the job.Chapter 7 does similar work, although it is structured differently.Namely, Verbrugge includes four sections that are concerned with public school teachers and college instructors before and after the early 1970s to elucidate how the passage of Title IX-a federal law prohibiting gender-based discrimination in all schools receiving government funding including colleges-affected women's physical education.The irony, Verbrugge notes, is that even as opportunities for girls and women to be active increased exponentially after 1972, women lost ground as administrators, educators, and coaches.Verbrugge writes, "With women's sports heralding career advancement and visibility, more men entered the arena, aided by well-established professional networks and favorable hiring practices" (p.192).In Chapters 2 and 8, Verbrugge considers how physical educators' ideas about sex difference measured up against medical science and popular opinion over the course of the 20th century.She further inquires about the consequences of these ideas for students in physical education classes.Verbrugge's treatment of these myriad philosophies of active womanhood is at once balanced and critical.She is clear about both the possibilities and pitfalls of her subjects'

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207