Exercise-enhanced satellite cell proliferation and new myonuclear accretion in rat skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of increased functional loading on early cellular regenerative events after exercise-induced injury in adult skeletal muscle were examined with the use of in vivo labeling of replicating myofiber nuclei and immunocyto- and histochemical techniques. Satellite cell proliferation in the soleus (Sol) of nonexercised rats (0.4 +/- 0.2% of fibers) was unchanged after an initial bout of declined treadmill exercise but was elevated after two (1.0 +/- 0.2%, P < or = 0.01), but not four or seven, daily bouts of the same task. Myonuclei produced over the 7-day period comprised 0.9-1.9% of myonuclei in isolated fibers of Sol, tibialis anterior, and vastus intermedius of nonexercised rats. The accretion of new myonuclei was enhanced (P < or = 0.05) in Sol and vastus intermedius by the initial exercise followed by normal activity (to 3.1-3.4% of myonuclei) and more so by continued daily exercise (4.2-5.3%). Observed coincident with a lower incidence of histological fiber injury and unchanged fiber diameter and myonuclei per millimeter, the greater new myonuclear accretion induced by continued muscle loading may contribute to an enhanced fiber repair and regeneration after exercise-induced injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".